The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: Kuwait has proposed setting up an international protection mission for Palestinians. A draft UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution presented by Kuwait calls for measures to guarantee the safety and protection of Palestinian civilians" in the occupied Palestinian territories and Gaza Strip". Would setting up an international peace mission help to stop the ongoing issue? Arguments: I. Yes, more than 100 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli firing in the last two months. II. No, Kuwait has no role to play in the ongoing war and must not interfere. III. No, Palestinians should be provided safety within the territories only and a new mission will result in more mass killings. Correct Answer Only I is strong. The correct answer is option 4, i.e. Only 'I' is strong. For marking the correct answer choice, some background information is mandatory regarding the ongoing issue. Kuwait has circulated a draft UN Security Council resolution on setting up an international protection mission for Palestinians. Highlighting Washington's isolation on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, Kuwait - a non-permanent Security Council member representing Arab countries - hopes to win a high number of votes in favour of its proposal. From this, we can understand that the most appropriate answer choice is option 4 as it deals with the outrage of the war that more than 100 Palestinians have been killed so far. ‘II’ is irrelevant and the reason has been already stated above. ‘III’ is also vague and does not support the given statement. Thus, the correct answer is option 4.