The given sentence has been broken up into four different parts. The error, if any, will be in one or more parts of the sentence. Select the option which contains the combination of the error. If all are correct mark Option 5 as your answer. Ratan Tata’s advocate told the Bombay High Court (A)/ that Nusli Wadia filled a criminal defamation case (B)/ for him because of a fallout of a corporate dispute as (C)/ Mr. Wadia was a strong supporter on the former Tata Sons chairman Cyrus Mistry. (D)/ All are correct (E) Correct Answer BCD • The correct answer is Option 1 i.e.Part BCD. • In Part B, change 'filled' to 'filed' because complaints can be 'filed' and not 'filled'. • In Part C, the use of the preposition 'for' is wrong because when we are complaining about someone/something we use the preposition 'against'. • In Part D, the use of the preposition 'on' doesn't make any sense. The correct preposition to be used here is 'of' which indicates to what something belongs.