In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No bikes are two-wheelers Statement II: All wheels are bikes Conclusion I: No two-wheelers are wheels Conclusion II: All wheels are two-wheelers Correct Answer Only conclusion I follows The least possible diagram of this question is as follows, [ alt="SSC CHSL 8March Shift2 Satyam S 25Q hrev.docx 1" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/19/01/SSC_CHSL_8March_Shift2_Satyam%20S_25Q_hrev.docx_1.PNG" style="width: 400px; height: 182px;"> Conclusion I: No two-wheelers are wheels → True Conclusion II: All wheels are two-wheelers → False Hence, only conclusion I follows.