In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: No two-wheelers are motorcycles. All motorcycles are bicycles. Conclusion: Some two-wheelers are bicycles. No motorcycles are two-wheelers. Correct Answer Only conclusion II follows The least possible venn diagram is: [ alt="F1 Zahida.K 05-08-2020 Savita D7" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/20/08/F1_Zahida.K_05-08-2020_Savita_D7.png" style="width: 327px; height: 95px;"> Some two-wheelers are bicycles. → False (As, no two-wheelers are motorcycles and All motorcycles are bicycles → So, it is not definite that Some two-wheelers are bicycles) No motorcycles are two-wheelers. → True (As, no two-wheelers are motorcycles. → So, no motorcycles are two-wheelers) Hence, only conclusion II follows.