In the question below are given some statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some Fanta is Limca. Some Pepsi is Fanta. All Fanta is Nimbuz. Conclusions: I. Some Pepsi is Nimbuz. II. Some Nimbuz is Limca. Correct Answer Both conclusions I and II follow. We draw the least possible Venn diagram: [ alt="F1 Shailendra.R Ravi 15.07.21 D5" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/21/07/F1_Shailendra.R_Ravi_15.07.21_D5.png" style="width: 207px; height: 106px;"> Conclusions: I. Some Pepsi is Nimbuz → It’s true. (as the part of Pepsi which is Fanta is also is a part of Nimbuz). II. Some Nimbuz is Limca →It’s true. (as Some Fanta is Limca and All Fanta is Nimbuz). Hence, both conclusions I and II follow.