In the question below, are given a passage followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Passage: There has been increased migration from Villages to Cities over the last few years in India. Poor villagers, denied of a reasonable means of livelihood in the villages, are migrating in groups to cities in search of better Economic prospects, but they do not know that the situation in the cities isn’t much better either. Result is just crowding up of cities. Nobody gains. Neither the villagers nor the urban people. Courses of action: I. The Government of India must announce a Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. II. The Government of India must ensure that the migrated villagers get a job in the cities so that they can survive. III. The Government of India must form a committee to study the deteriorating Economic and Employment scenario of the country and suggest remedial measures. Correct Answer Only III follows. Course of Action I does not provide a solution to the problem There are already Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in place such as MGNREGA but, as is evident from the passage, such schemes have failed to curb migration. Moreover, they put additional burden on Government’s financial resources in a deteriorating Economic scenario. Hence, Course of Action I does not follow. Let’s evaluate Course of Action II. It doesn’t solve our core problem of migration and will only serve to put additional burden on cities’ resources and the Government exchequer. Hence, Course of Action II does not follow. Course of Action III is required. Clearly, the Economic and Employment situation in both villages and cities are not in good shape so that needs to be studied in detail. Hence, Course of Action III follows. So, only Course of Action III follows.