In the question below, a statement followed by two courses of actions numbered I and II are given. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Congress MP Jyotiraditya Scindia has slammed a website which calculates dowry based on the skin colour, caste, and educational institutions attended by grooms. The options for complexion of the groom include "Pitch Black (not visible on a moonless night)" and "Wheatish (Almost white. Would need some Fair n Lovely)". Course of action I. Such websites shouldn't be ridiculed as they help people to judge the groom and dowry based on several parameters and is an effective measure of the compatibility. II. Awareness regarding such websites must be made and all the match making decisions must be based on the outcomes of the calculations. Correct Answer Neither I nor II follows The correct answer is option 4, i.e. Neither I nor II follows. In the statement itself it is stated that Congress MP Jyotiraditya Scindia has slammed (criticized harshly) such kind of a website. Moreover, dowry is illegal and such practices shouldn't be promoted. 'I' is irrelevant as it says that people use this website as it provides an effective measure of compatibility. How can a website judging people on the basis of their education or complexion can provide a perfect result to prove compatibility between two people. Moreover, if someone wants to measure compatibility it must enter the bride's details also and such a option is not mentioned in the statement. 'II' is also vague as none can rely on a random result of any website as the calculations can be erroneous and such sites must be banned instead of being promoted. Thus, the correct answer is option 4.