In question some statements are given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any follow from the given statements. Indicate your answer. Statements: I. No sofas is chairs II. All sofas are tables III. No tables are mats Conclusions: I. No mats are sofas II. All chairs can possibly be tables Correct Answer Both I and II follow Minimum possible venn diagram can be describe as below: [ alt="ajay1dssdsdsererere2124" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/17/01/ajay1dssdsdsererere2124.png" style="height:152px; width:400px"> I. No mats are sofas = clearly follows. II. All chairs can possibly be tables = its possible, hence true( Possibility shown below.) [ alt="ajay1ereredfsdfsdfre2124" src="//storage.googleapis.com/tb-img/production/17/01/ajay1ereredfsdfsdfre2124.png" style="height:178px; width:400px"> Hence, both conclusion I and II follows.