Dispelling the ‘misconception' that India subsidises its exports, Commerce Minister Suresh Prabhu today asserted that the country fully complies with the guidelines of the WTO, which itself is ‘under threat'. Batting for the global trade body, Prabhu said all countries will face problems if there is no WTO. He said the government was merely trying to mitigate the adversities of exporters, which did not tantamount to subsidising of exports from India. Which of the following can be logically deduced from the statement above? Correct Answer None can be deduced. The correct answer is option 5, i.e. None can be deduced. Options (2) and (3) are irrelevant and can be rejected on the first reading as we cannot infer anything which is not mentioned in the above-given statement. Both the options state independent ideas regarding ‘exports to the tune of USD 100 billion' and ‘countries were giving more subsidies to their farmers' respectively. Option (4) can also be rejected as no information is stated regarding the fact that there is a trade dispute between India and the US and India is trying to resolve it. Option (1) could have been a perfect deduction if the exact details regarding the meeting wouldn't have been mentioned. As we cannot infer anything on our own, none of the options stated captures the essence of the above statement and is thus not suitable deductions. Hence, the most appropriate answer choice is option 5.