A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement? Statement: Leading electronics company offered their employees a free and unlimited supply of Redbull for 3 days. Inferences: I. They had to meet a deadline which needed the employees to work without too many breaks. II. The company had a promotional tie-up with Redbull. Correct Answer Only inference I follows Given the fact that Redbull is a caffeinated energy drink it can be safely implied that the company wanted its employees to function at full capacity for those 3 days. Therefore, it can be assumed that this was the company’s way of ensuring that the employees meet some nearing deadline. Whether the company had a promotional tie-up with Redbull is not something that can be inferred from the information provided. Hence, only inference I can be safely drawn making option 1 the correct answer.