A set of 4 sentences (A, B, C and D in the same order) have been given in the above question followed by five option choices. From the option choice provided look for the option choice that acts as the fifth sentence (conclusion) for the statements mentioned. A. Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a letter to his new Pakistani counterpart Imran Khan has called for bilateral engagement, sources confirmed on Monday. B. In the first official communication with the new administration in Islamabad, the Indian leader has called for building on good neighbourly ties for security and prosperity in the region. C. The Indian response came soon after the newly appointed Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that Mr. Modi has indicated at dialogue in his letter. However, the official said that India has not called for dialogue so far. D. Prime Minister wrote of constructive approach or engagement for the benefit of the people, by which he meant Pakistan should create conducive atmosphere. Correct Answer The Prime Minister’s call for engagement comes in the backdrop of recent Indian insistence that Delhi will hold talks only if Pakistan acts against terror suspects and outfits. The correct answer is option 5, i.e. The Prime Minister’s call for engagement comes in the backdrop of recent Indian insistence that Delhi will hold talks only if Pakistan acts against terror suspects and outfits. A conclusion must sum up all the ideas and does not introduce new ideas, thus, it can be rejected. Option 1 can be rejected as it does not give the answer to ‘We’. Therefore, it does not looks as an appropriate conclusion rather, it generates new ideas and can be rejected. Option 2 can also be eliminated as it introduces a new idea of ‘Kashmir’ which is nowhere evident from the given set of sentences. Option 3 can be eliminated as it does not logically supports the content in sentence D. It may have been an appropriate conclusion but it sums up the ideas which are not supported by the given four sentences. Option 4 can also be eliminated as it also generates new set of ideas regarding ‘China Pakistan Economic Corridor’ and thus, does not sum up the given context appropriately. Option 5 is the most perfect conclusion among the given option choices as it proposes a fact that the P.M.’s response was because of the terror reasons which can also be inferred from B (where topics of security and prosperity are discussed). Thus, only option 5 captures the essence of the statements and looks as the most appropriate answer choice. Thus, the sentences can be structured as, Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a letter to his new Pakistani counterpart Imran Khan has called for bilateral engagement, sources confirmed on Monday. In the first official communication with the new administration in Islamabad, the Indian leader has called for building on good neighbourly ties for security and prosperity in the region. The Indian response came soon after the newly appointed Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that Mr. Modi has indicated at dialogue in his letter. However, the official said that India has not called for dialogue so far. Prime Minister wrote of constructive approach or engagement for the benefit of the people, by which he meant Pakistan should create conducive atmosphere. The Prime Minister’s call for engagement comes in the backdrop of recent Indian insistence that Delhi will hold talks only if Pakistan acts against terror suspects and outfits.