A question is given on the basis of two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question. Question: Should there be a maximum limit for the number of ministers in the central government? Argument: I. No. The political party in power should be given freedom to decide the number of ministers to be appointed. II. Yes. To avoid unnecessary expenditure, the number of ministers should be limited to some percentage of the total number of seats in Parliament. Correct Answer Both Arguments I and II are strong. Logic: We have to analyze the question and then we need to conclude if the argument is strong as per the question. "Question: Should there be a maximum limit for the number of ministers in the central government?" Now we have to analyse the argument. I. No. The political party in power should be given freedom to decide the number of ministers to be appointed. Conclusion: This statement is strong. An increase in the number of ministers will provide the government with a better surrounding to execute any task very easily and properly. II. Yes. To avoid unnecessary expenditure, the number of ministers should be limited to some percentage of the total number of seats in Parliament. Conclusion: This statement is Strong. An increase in ministers will also result in more expenditure in form of salaries and other expenses. As it can be seen that both of the statements are strong. Therefore, the correct answer is "Both Arguments I and II are strong.".